|

References

1 Leave a comment on paragraph 1 0 Adam, D., 2002. The counting house. Nature, 415(6873), pp.726–9.

2 Leave a comment on paragraph 2 0 Alexander, R., 2013. BBC News – Reinhart, Rogoff… and Herndon: The student who caught out the profs. BBC News (onlie). Available at: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-22223190 [Accessed April 22, 2013].

3 Leave a comment on paragraph 3 0 Anderson, A., 1991. No Citation Analyses Please, We’re British. Science, p.639.

4 Leave a comment on paragraph 4 0 Anon, 2013. Web of Knowledge: About us page. Available at: http://wokinfo.com/about/whoweare/ [Accessed April 1, 2013].

5 Leave a comment on paragraph 5 0 Ardichvili, A., Page, V. & Wentling, T., 2003. Motivation and barriers to participation in virtual knowledge-sharing communities of practice. Journal of Knowledge Management, 7(1), pp.64–77.

6 Leave a comment on paragraph 6 0 Arnold, D.N. & Fowler, K.K., 2010. Nefarious Numbers. Notices of the AMS, 314(1997), p.5.

7 Leave a comment on paragraph 7 0 Bar-Ilan, J., 2008. Which h-index? — A comparison of WoS, Scopus and Google Scholar. Scientometrics, 74(2), pp.257–271.

8 Leave a comment on paragraph 8 0 Bizer, C., Heath, T. & Berners-Lee, T., 2009. Linked data-the story so far. International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems

9 Leave a comment on paragraph 9 1 Blackwell, A. et al., 2010. Creating value across boundaries, NESTA

10 Leave a comment on paragraph 10 0 Bornmann, L. & Daniel, H., 2007. What Do We Know About the h Index ? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(9), pp.1381–1385.

11 Leave a comment on paragraph 11 1 Braun, T., 2003. The reliability of total citation rankings. Journal of chemical information and computer sciences, 43(1), pp.45–6.

12 Leave a comment on paragraph 12 0 Brown, J.S., 2002. Growing up digital: How the web changes work, education, and the ways people learn. United States Distance Learning Association Journal, 16(2), pp.10–20.

13 Leave a comment on paragraph 13 0 Brown, J. & Duguid, P., 1991. Organizational learning and communities-of-practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation. Organization science, 2(1), pp.40–57.

14 Leave a comment on paragraph 14 0 Buneman, P. et al., 2011. The Database Wiki Project : A General-Purpose Platform for Data Curation and Collaboration. SIGMOD Record, 40(3), pp.15–20.

15 Leave a comment on paragraph 15 0 Cameron, R., 1997. A universal citation database as a catalyst for reform in scholarly communication. First Monday, 2(4).

16 Leave a comment on paragraph 16 0 Corcho, O., 2006. Ontology based document annotation: trends and open research problems. International Journal of Metadata, Semantics and …, 1(1).

17 Leave a comment on paragraph 17 0 Cronin, B & Overfelt, K., 1994. Citation based auditing of academic performance. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 45(2), pp.61–73.

18 Leave a comment on paragraph 18 1 Cronin, Blaise, 1984. The citation process, London: Taylor Graham.

19 Leave a comment on paragraph 19 0 Davis, P., 2011. Gaming the Impact Factor Puts Journal In Time-out. The Scholarly Kitchen. Available at: http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2011/10/17/gaming-the-impact-factor-puts-journal-in-time-out/ [Accessed April 19, 2013].

20 Leave a comment on paragraph 20 0 DTI, 1999. UK Competitiveness Indicators. Department for Trade and Industry Report, p.35. Available at: http://www.dti.gov.uk/comp/competitive/pdfs/compindx.pdf [Accessed April 4, 2013].

21 Leave a comment on paragraph 21 0 EASE, 2007. EASE statement on inappropriate use of impact factors. European Association of Science Editors, pp.1–2. Available at: http://www.ease.org.uk/publications/impact-factor-statement [Accessed March 13, 2013].

22 Leave a comment on paragraph 22 0 EPSRC, 2013. EPSRC Funding Guide. Available at: http://www.epsrc.ac.uk/SiteCollectionDocuments/FundingGuide.pdf [Accessed April 19, 2013].

23 Leave a comment on paragraph 23 0 Francois, J. & Quek, F., 2011. [Book review of] Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. In Proceding of the CHI conference, April 4-9, 2011, Boston.

24 Leave a comment on paragraph 24 0 Galligan, F. & Dyas-Correia, S., 2013. Altmetrics: Rethinking the Way We Measure. Serials Review, 39(1), pp.56–61.

25 Leave a comment on paragraph 25 0 García-Castro, L., Giraldo, O. & García, A., 2012. Using annotations to model discourse: an extension to the Annotation Ontology. In Proceedings of the Workshop on the Semantic Publishing (SePublica 2012). pp. 13–22.

26 Leave a comment on paragraph 26 0 Garfield, E, 2012. A Century of Citation Indexing. Collnet Journal of Scientometrics and Information Management, (March), p.2012.

27 Leave a comment on paragraph 27 0 Garfield, E, 1983a. How to Use Citation Analysis for Faculty Evaluations , and When Is It Relevant? Essays of an Information Scientist, 6, pp.354–362.

28 Leave a comment on paragraph 28 0 Garfield, E, 1983b. How to Use Citation Analysis for Faculty Evaluations, and When Is It Relevant? , pp.363–372.

29 Leave a comment on paragraph 29 0 Garfield, Eugene, 1955. Citation indexes for science. A new dimension in documentation through association of ideas. Science, 123(3159), pp.108–111.

30 Leave a comment on paragraph 30 0 Giles, C., Bollacker, KD & Lawrence, S., 1998. CiteSeer: An Automatic Citation Indexing System. In … of the third ACM conference on ….

31 Leave a comment on paragraph 31 0 Groth, P. & Gurney, T., 2010. Studying scientific discourse on the Web using bibliometrics: A chemistry blogging case study.

32 Leave a comment on paragraph 32 0 Hargens, L.L. & Schuman, H., 1990. Citation counts and social comparisons: Scientists’ use and evaluation of citation index data. Social Science Research, 19(3), pp.205–221.

33 Leave a comment on paragraph 33 0 Harnad, S. & Brody, T., 2004. Comparing the Impact of Open Access (OA) vs. Non-OA Articles in the Same Journals. D-Lib Magazine, 10(6).

34 Leave a comment on paragraph 34 0 Herndon, T. & Pollin, R., 2013. Does High Public Debt Consistently Stifle Economic Growth? A Critique of Reinhart and Rogoff. Unpublished.

35 Leave a comment on paragraph 35 0 Hori, M., Abe, M. & Ono, K., 2003. Extensible framework of authoring tools for Web document annotation. Proceedings of International Workshop on Semantic Web …, pp.1–16.

36 Leave a comment on paragraph 36 0 Jinha, A.E., 2010. Article 50 million: an estimate of the number of scholarly articles in existence. Learned Publishing, 23(3), pp.258–263.

37 Leave a comment on paragraph 37 0 Kelly, C.D. & Jennions, M.D., 2006. The h index and career assessment by numbers. Trends in ecology & evolution, 21(4), pp.167–70.

38 Leave a comment on paragraph 38 0 Krichel, T. & Warner, S., 2001. A metadata framework to support scholarly communication. In DC-2001-Tokyo Proceedings.

39 Leave a comment on paragraph 39 0 Lawrence, S., Giles, C.L. & Bollacker, K, 1999. Digital Libraries and Autonomous Citation Indexing. Computer, 36(August 2001), pp.67–71.

40 Leave a comment on paragraph 40 0 Lindley, J., 2013. Impact Metrics: There are Lies, damned lies, and statstics. Unpublished. Available at: http://joesart.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/JL-High403-Lies-Damned-Lies-Statistics.pdf [Accessed April 22, 2013].

41 Leave a comment on paragraph 41 1 López-Cózar, E.D., 2012. Manipulating Google Scholar Citations and Google Scholar Metrics: simple, easy and tempting. , (Butler 2011), pp.1–10.

42 Leave a comment on paragraph 42 1 Lowy, C., 1997. Impact factor limits funding. The Lancet, 350(9083), p.1997.

43 Leave a comment on paragraph 43 1 LSE, Introduction: Defining Research Impacts. Impact of Social Sciences. Available at: http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/introduction/ [Accessed April 25, 2013].

44 Leave a comment on paragraph 44 0 MacRoberts, M. & MacRoberts, B., 1989. Problems of Citation Analysis : A Critical Review. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 40(5), pp.342–349.

45 Leave a comment on paragraph 45 0 Monastersky, R., 2005. The Number That’s Devouring Science. The Chronicle of Higher Education (October 14). Available at: http://www3.nd.edu/~pkamat/citations/chronicle.pdf [Accessed April 22, 2013].

46 Leave a comment on paragraph 46 0 Neylon, C & Wu, S., 2009. Article-level metrics and the evolution of scientific impact. PLoS biology.

47 Leave a comment on paragraph 47 0 Piwowar, H.A., 2013. Value all research products. Nature, 493, p.159.

48 Leave a comment on paragraph 48 0 Priem, J. et al., 2010. altmetrics: a manifesto. Available at: http://altmetrics.org/ [Accessed March 13, 2013].

49 Leave a comment on paragraph 49 1 Priem, J. & Hemminger, B.H., 2010. Scientometrics: The state of the art. First Monday, 15(7).

50 Leave a comment on paragraph 50 0 Priem, J., Piwowar, H.A. & Hemminger, B.M., 2012. Altmetrics in the wild: Using social media to explore scholarly impact. ACM Web Science Conference 2012 Workshop.

51 Leave a comment on paragraph 51 0 Ralph, P., 2013. Dr. Paul Ralph comment on peer-review. Facebook status update. Available at: https://www.facebook.com/DrPaulRalph/posts/563887100317599 [Accessed April 22, 2013].

52 Leave a comment on paragraph 52 0 REF, 2011. Decisions on assessing research impact. Available at: http://www.ref.ac.uk/media/ref/content/pub/decisionsonassessingresearchimpact/01_11.pdf [Accessed April 19, 2013].

53 Leave a comment on paragraph 53 1 SCG, Ranking of Economics journals based on the Impact Factor. Social Capital Gateway. Available at: http://www.socialcapitalgateway.org/content/ranking/ranking-economics-journals-based-impact-factor [Accessed April 22, 2013].

54 Leave a comment on paragraph 54 0 Seglen, P.O., 1992. The skewness of science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 43(9), pp.628–638.

55 Leave a comment on paragraph 55 0 Sherer, P., Shea, T. & Kristensen, E., 2003. Online communities of practice: A catalyst for faculty development. Innovative Higher Education, 27(3), pp.183–195.

56 Leave a comment on paragraph 56 0 TED, 2009. Tim Berners-Lee on the next Web. Available at: http://www.ted.com/talks/tim_berners_lee_on_the_next_web.html [Accessed March 2, 2013].

57 Leave a comment on paragraph 57 0 Teufel, S., Siddharthan, A. & Tidhar, D., 2006a. An annotation scheme for citation function. In Proceedings of the 7th SIGdial Workshop on Discourse and Dialogue. pp. 80–87.

58 Leave a comment on paragraph 58 0 Teufel, S., Siddharthan, A. & Tidhar, D., 2006b. Automatic classification of citation function. In Proceedings of the 2006 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. pp. 103–110.

59 Leave a comment on paragraph 59 0 UKRC, 2013. UKRC pathways to impact. Available at: http://www.rcuk.ac.uk/documents/impacts/RCUKtypologydiagram.pdf [Accessed April 19, 2013].

60 Leave a comment on paragraph 60 0 Vaughan, L. & Shaw, D., 2003. Bibliographic and Web citations: What is the difference? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(14), pp.1313–1322.

61 Leave a comment on paragraph 61 1 Wenger, 2006. Communities of Practice: A brief introduction. Available at: http://www.ewenger.com/theory/ [Accessed April 3, 2013].

62 Leave a comment on paragraph 62 0 Wenger, E., 2000. Communities of Practice and social learning systems. Organization, 7(2), pp.225–246.

63 Leave a comment on paragraph 63 0 Wolff, J., 2010. The impact of research – so hard to pin down. The Guardian.

 

page 9

Source: http://communitiesofimpact.joesart.org/references/